Видео

Where are the stop request buttons?

Disgusting what the democrats are doing to this state. 😢

I dislike dirty scummy peeps like that man. 😮

What a sexy little car ❤

Kris Tyson

Lol. Did that for over 34 years. Now a FPA. This vid is how we do it. Get your mind right poster. This is real world.

Is this the ghetto area in Southern California

... These days, people have no Respect for Putting their trash and swearing in the Bus.

😴zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I was in high school during this time. I truly loved riding the buses back in the 80s and 90s. The fleet was diverse

OCTA 1997 New Flyer D40LF #5331 will retire and auctioned off at General Auction Company or any auction first and then sold to Starline Tours Hollywood to convert a open top double decker.

Dormitorio público 😴

Frontier is a private company. For public saftey they do have the right to make sure you stay out of their work zone. I would have told you to get further back. record all you want, but that is why the area is coned off. Public officals you can record all day and night in their line of work, but Frontier is a private company working on their lines/equipment in that man hole. that is their property under the ground that they are in the right of way to access. try that in the wrong area, and you will get arrested due to sensitive information.

Why is there a orange line metro liner bus at El Monte sta on the silver line at 14:32?

Pretty hyped for this line honestly. In the map, I have Line 161 extended further west to The Oaks Mall and California Lutheran University via Hillcrest Av/Moorpark Rd. I also have one Metro Line (160) running from Moorpark-Simi Valley-Chatsworth, though Simi Valley Line 10 runs similarly (my Line 160 routing is different). Also really glad NextGen was nice enough to add Sunday service for Line 161's Thousand Oaks segment.

I wonder if Metro owns all the transit agencies in LA county, I mean they all use Tap and Metro extends their light rail into cities where their busses usually don't serve.

Nice car

I am a "registered Foamer lol", so I film buses and trains all the time. Let them try and stop me, I actually like to rewatch my footage because well, I love buses and trains. They should be happy I am so into transit, and promoting it.

I like all the suggestions except for privatizing Metro & closing stations. We need those stations for metro rail to work.

I’ve always felt safe on transit in LA. BUT WHAT THE HELL HAS BEEN GOING ON THESE PAST FEW MONTHS?!?

Now, I'll give my thoughts on some of the suggestions. (not listed means no comment as I agree) 1. A surge of police and SECURITY is needed. However, some officers are just chilling, but THEY MUST BE TRAINED to take action. Maybe some mental health guards should be added at some rail stations too. 2. Metro should use its profit funds (not tax dollars) to create an MTA App with the TAP Card option. If the person applies for a TAP Card and interlines with their phones, they will get 3 free rides by default to claim at the app for the TAP card (within 6 months (will be refreshed when the service changes occur). This will help riders who may have emergency rides that they cannot afford, in the app when they claim the free ride, the tap card is activated per the span of 3 hours when they tap at the bus, so they can have unlimited transfers within the time frame. They will need to use the free ride option very wisely. I agree that no zero-fare tolerance is needed. Another option is to do a TAP card rewards system which will be accessible via the mobile app only if the card number is linked. 3. I'm mixed with this, the MTA is already expanding all-door boarding to all lines systemwide by 2024. If all-door boarding doesn't go well, I think it should be kept for lines with high ridership and BRTs like the G Line as exempt. Some areas had shown that fare-evading had decreased when after the all-door boarding had been implemented. 6. TAP Card readers outside would be very complex to do at nearly 3000 buses from MTA. This could work as a pilot for select lines especially with lines that have the highest fare evaders. Overall, I think this suggestion is not ideal for a reason. This has the potential to cause more taxes to be wasted. 7. The Ambassadors are useless but also helpful as they can help navigate the riders (maybe a call button would make them more useful). I think the MTA should purge at least 60-75% of the ambassadors and train the remaining ones who have more knowledge of the system. The Metro Police is of course needed and they definitely need to be trained. 8. The MTA should have the money to give pepper spray to all of the operators. Firearms should be encouraged and allowed if they have the permit and the training. 9. Some Metro Rail Stations are highly utilized and it could be an issue to close some of them down. Many of the bus lines will be required to be relocated if that were the case, ik this is your imagination, but zero shot they'll shut down Vermont Station. Bus paralleling rail could work, though the freeway bus express lines parallel rail are one of the slowest and the lowest utilized lines in the system (some are exempt such as J Line, 460, 577, etc.). It would be ideal if a local bus let's say Line 120 which parallels the C Line increased its headway to every 15 minutes instead of currently 40-60 minutes. A normal 700-series Rapid Line could work, but it needs to reach a minimum of 5,000 daily riders and must have a max of 15 minutes or better frequency, failure to do so will be eliminated, with no exceptions. 10. Metro should keep Rail, Micro, and Bus with the Metro trademark and branding while spinoff the non-transit options like highways, construction, roadways, etc. to a different agency from the county.

I got a student TAP card a couple months ago as a way I could travel the bus whenever I don't have a trip from school to home. Uber is gosh darn expensive that I cannot afford. Good thing I had been safe during all the trips I had taken including Lines 18, 106, and 258 (these lines I took at least didn't have any problems). Luckily there were no fights or arguments on either of the lines I had taken. Though a guy was banging the doors when Line 66 was due to leave at the Montebello Station (my dad works near Montebello), the guy fell asleep at the platform and missed the buy angrily when it was about to leave (I wish I recorded it). Originally I had planned to use the TAP card for traveling further places like Whittwood Center for fun, but with safety issues happening, I will only use the bus for emergency purposes such as a no-car ride home. Many lines in the Gateway Cities area (mainly east of the Atlantic) are relatively safer than the lines in the south-central and west sides, but ironically Munis are safer than Metro. Metro really needs to take action to fix the safety issues. It is unacceptable. To be fair MTA did have safety issues in the past even before COVID was a thing. The tax dollars should be used to increase frequency/reroutes, shuttles, and most importantly safety like ambassadors, officers, and security. MTA could use the money for non-essential stuff like art and concerts (unless it is to promote more services offered to the concert like the Taylor Swift era's tour where it increased ridership heavily) from profit such as fare revenue and merchandise. Forgot to mention, that North Hollywood Station became the first station as a pilot to require riders to TAP while exiting on the platform, at least this is a small victory.

LA metro definitly needs to get its act together on safety. I have no experience with crime while I was onboard (out of pure luck), but i know that in order for ridership to grow, there needs to be better planning, police, and paying passengers in order for the system to feel safe for riders. This is probably not a new trend with Metro, though.

Save us TMN! Save us from the low life’s. Shame on Metro for letting this get out of control.

This is terrible news, thank you for bringing awareness to this issue.

Hollywood 🥶

Metro coach lines was doing this line in 1955 when Disneyland opened. But I think its faster by motorized scooter

Little off topic from this vid but going through bus videos from the past, me discovering octa had routes to LA (through a sign at Goldenwest) and Riverside (Through Here), those getting cut, was there ever an official say on why it was discontinued?

Yes!!!

Time of the bus 50 on Philadelphia an painter

You don’t have a right to record in private property, you talking monkey.

The GMC had a poster for a bugs life if you noticed.

I love the sound of the Detroit Diesel engine it’s a legend of all engines

Now I know what’s under the Flxible Metro ADB it’s similar to the Grumman Flxible 870 ADB

Can you pay with your phone?

I would like to go from Anaheim to universal studios

FINALLY YALL CAME BACK YESSS

That's very interesting.

I'm enjoying the ride thank you.

This must be Downtown Riverside Ca

if u look at the frame around 2:55...look at the victims stance. It appears the guy was trying to run across the street in front of the bus, which is a big no-no from a pedestrian safety standpoint, but the bus operator should've stopped to preserved the scene

What are your honest thoughts on the measure HLA that was recently passed? On the bright side, nearly the entire Venice Bl will get bus lanes from DTLA to the beach compared to a portion currently for 24/7, so at least this will make Line 33 much faster as it is right now or perhaps it can be faster than Line 733. Line 4 will also get bus lanes, though Sunset Bl is only for peaks, Santa Monica Bl's bus lanes will also be 24/7 (only within the city limits of LA). Some of the 24/7 bus lanes also proposed on measure HLA include Broadway, Crenshaw, La Brea, Los Feliz/Colorado, Slauson, Whittier, Figueroa, Valley, Wilshire, Sepulveda, and Lincoln. Most of these corridors have or had a Rapid Line, so these will benefit them to be as fast as Rapid Lines or at least faster than it is currently.

Gracias x existing x las personas mayor's queno manejamos

Gracias x su Lindo servicio

This Driver and another named Walter were some of the best.

I had a job in Malibu when I was 20. Rode this bus there to Pt. Dume. This was a truly nice ride. For once, I got to just enjoy it.

I loved these buses!!!!!!! I was a Bus Operator out of Div 9 when I worked the 18/318 Lines!!!!!

I found some good news regarding service on Imperial Hwy for both Metro Line 120 AND Norwalk Transit Line 4. Metro Line 120 at this time won't end at Norwalk Station with the split of Line 621 for 2 reasons (found in board meeting archives per video at Gateway Cities). - Overcapacity at Norwalk Transit Center - A requirement of an extra bus to create Line 621. However, when the new LAX/Metro Transit Center Station opens for service, all lines residing at LAX City Bus Center AND Aviation/LAX will be relocated at this new terminal. Line 120 will be included, and for the first time, there will be a direct connection between LAX Transit Center and Line 120 since 2003. Likely, Line 120 will still run to Whittwood by the time the K and C Lines connect. Regarding Norwalk Transit, on one of the agendas of the city, I found the proposed Norwalk Transit changes (no map, but like shown on the document per description). All the proposed changes are good. The following include: - An increase in frequency to every line in Norwalk Transit. - A new Saturday service on Line 5 (former Line 125 east) with a new Sunday service on Line 7 (former Line 270 south). - An extension of Line 3 to Cerritos Town Center. Though the best news of all is Norwalk Transit is considering extending Line 4 from Beach Bl to Brea Mall. This will recover service on Imperial Hwy to once it was back in the 1980s-'90s or for the first time since OCTA Line 20 was discontinued in 2016. In a perfect world, I believe Metro Line 120 should be combined with Norwalk Line 4 as Metro Line 120, providing a direct service on Imperial Hwy from Brea to LAX. The portion between Whittwood and Norwalk C Line via the existing Line 120 would be given to Line 621 (should be Line 121) (this may sound bad, but at least Line 120 would be able to travel on what it used to be in the past, also sister lines can cause the frequency and reliability to dwindle a bit).

Im joining the network

Man preciate you also ride buses in la metro and LADOT Thank you very much